Jury finds The New York Times did not libel former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin

New York – The New York Times did not face a mistake in a 2017 institution, which he says, damaged his reputation, a jury ended Tuesday.

The jury considered the jury shortly after reaching the verdict after the palace and newspaper lawyers and newspaper lawyers. In his second week.

Immediately the announcement of the decision by a jury’s foreperson. Later, Palin was suppressed, who said that the Times “is not an adultery.”

They Testified to Monday After an institution on gun violence, threats of death against him increased and its souls fell that their political action committee played a vital role in political rhetoric that has enabled the atmosphere of violence.

The Times fixed less than 14 hours of its publishing.

Palin was overwhelmed when she left the courthouse for the last time and was going to a waiting car, and told reporters: “I have to go to the house of a beautiful family and a beautiful property and move forward with life. And that’s good.”

Later, he posted on the social platform X that he “did not prevail” in his legal action, but expressed his commitment to “stop making the press to make things.”

Palin’s lawyer, Kenneth Trial, said that when he left the court that the legal team would review all the post trail and all the powers of the appeal.

Times spokesman, Daniel Rhodes Ha, said in a statement that the decision “confirms an important principle of US law: publishers are not responsible for honest mistakes.”

In his closing argument, Tarkal urged the jury to find the Times responsible for the notoriety on the basis that its former editorial page editor, James Bennett, knew either what he was publishing or worked with “neglect of neglect” for the truth.

He asked the jury to pay the loss of pellet compensation for the loss of reputation and private mental distress, adding that he “should find a number and allow him to shut down something.”

“To date, no accountability has happened,” he said. “That’s why we are here.”

He told the judges not to deceive the witnesses on the stand by the “bonnie” personality.

“She doesn’t cry much,” Tarkel said. “This could be an honest mistake for them. It was a changer of life.”

Palin, who received a journalism degree in the college, filed a lawsuit against the Times in 2017 for illegal losses, when he exploded on the national stage as a Republican Vice President.

The case was filed by an editorial editorial about the control of guns published after Steve Skilse, a Republican Republican Republican in Louisiana, when a man with anti -GOP activity on the Congress baseball team practice in Washington in 2017 was fired.

In the editorial, the Times writes that former US Representative Gabbi Giffords was seriously injured and six others were killed before the mass firing in Arizona, the Times wrote, the Palin’s Political Action Committee had circulated the map of the election districts, which had been hit by a map of the district.

In a correction, the Times said that the editorial has falsely said that there is a link between political rhetoric and the shooting of 2011, and it has falsely described the map.

A tearbnetic bent Last week, he apologized to the Palin from the test stand, when he said he had been mistakenly harassed and that readers immediately worked to fix it after complaining to the newspaper.

“There is no piece of evidence shown other than an honest mistake,” Felicia Ellis Worth, Felicia Elsworth, in his end. “

Ellis Worth said that once the error was discovered, Bennett and the Times “corrected the record loudly, clearly and quickly”.

The lawyer pointed out that several times the editors permanently testified about their efforts to correct the mistake and its importance that they had put on accuracy, while Pilin’s claims were “not supported anything other than that.”

“For the Government Palin, this is just another opportunity to take fake news,” said Alice Worth.

In February 2022, Judge Jade S. Rockoff Rejected Palin’s claims A decision was issued while a jury considered. The judge then allowed the judges to give his verdict, which also went against Palin.

Second US Circuit Court appeals in Manhattan Restored the case Last year

The appeal court said the dismissal decision had wrongly entered the jury’s work. It also cited the flaws in the trial, saying that the wrongdoing of the evidence, the wrong guidance of the jury and the jury’s question was the wrong answer.