Google remedy hearing on search monopoly begins today. Could the tech giant be broken up?

In Washington, DC, a hearing began today, which can determine if Google is in its current form, or if it may face fines such as selling its famous Chrome web browser.

The so -called treatment is the result of hearing A The judicial decision last August This shows that Google is running a monopoly and uses its dominant market position to crush rivals and put a lid on innovation.

The US Department of Justice is debating that Google should be forced to divide its chrome browser, which the agency described as “the largest entry points for search.” The government says that by selling Chrome, competitors may have the opportunity to face search questions, but such a change will rapidly new shapes of Google’s parents, the alphabet, which is a tech giant with a market price of $ 1.8 trillion.

“Google can compete, but they do not just want to compete on the level of playing field,” said David Dhloquest, the department’s attorney, David Dahlokest. “Google is now afraid to compete against rivals, which will only be stronger with the proposed treatment.”

This hearing comes just a few days after Google is a brand of abusive monopoly Separate case He ruled that Tech Dev had illegally exploited some of his online marketing technology to increase profits. The recent case focuses on Google’s online advertising business, which has been built around its search engine and other widely used products, including Chrome and YouTube.

What to know about the current treatment hearing.

What is Google hearing?

American District Judge Amit Mehta Ruled in August That Google has illegally exploited its dominance to prevent squash competition and innovation.

According to a November research note by Goldman Sax analyst Eric Sheriden, the current hearing is aimed at tackling potential treatments, which will be expected to issue a decision by August 2025.

Assistant Attorney General Gen. Gail Slater said on Monday, Assistant Attorney General Gen. Gayle Slater said, “We are not to re -connect the case here, we will ask the court here to remove the damage from Google’s illegal behavior.” Description Before the opening arguments of the hearing.

What does the Department of Justice want?

The Justice Department is emphasizing several changes, Dahlukist said during the trial on Monday.

They include:

• Forcing Google to waste the Chrome browser;
• Google needs to share some data so that newcomers can overcome the barriers to admission.
• Syndicateing search and advertising data that will facilitate rivals to use Google’s search results to improve their standards.

Some changes sought by the DOJ will last for years, Sheridan noted that these requirements “will” enable Google to access its search index, available for available user and advertising search data (up to 10 years), its search text data will be syndicate for up to 10 years.

What will happen to Chrome?

June Slate, representing a group of states, who joined the Justice Department in the matter, said in its preliminary statements that its first priority was Chrome discrimination.

He added that Chrome is a “widespread attractive asset” with more than 4.1 billion global consumers. “Such an asset does not come often.”

Distribution can occur in a number of ways, such as spin off or sales of a business unit. In some cases, the current shareholders of a company – in this case, Google Parent Alfbit – receives new shares in the Division Business.

AT&T may be one of the famous companies that have been broken after being accused of monopolism. The phone’s giant was divided into several small companies as part of the 1982 settlement with the US government, which resulted in the formation of several small regional phone operators like Bell South and Bell Atlantic.

Goldman’s Sheriden added that separating Chrome will potentially cause financial loss to Google’s income. He said it would not only restrict Google Search Revenue, but also restrict the search volume of the search and access to user data.

What is Google’s answer to DOJ?

Google attacked the government’s proposed dissatisfaction treatment, its lead attorney John Schmidtlin termed him “basically poor” and argued that he would punish the company unfairly for his innovation.

“Google gained its market position with hard work and ease,” said Schmdetlin.

He said that a difference in Chrome is “far from easy”, he said that his treatment will go beyond the browser to include the open source chromeium project which Google has developed and has endorsed it for years.

“This order not only demands chrome but also demands everything important for chromium functionality,” said Schmdetlin. “What does that mean? They are leaving it in a technical committee, but there is no explanation for the formation of the necessary assets.”

He criticized the process, saying it lacked a clear way to evaluate potential buyers, and warned that Google would be effectively stopped from the browser market for 10 years. “I can’t think of an anti -trust treatment that comes closer to it,” he added.