Google Pixel 9a vs. iPhone 16e: I camera-tested both phones, and there’s a clear winner

Google Pixel 9A And Apple iPhone 16 E Right now you are included in the best phones you can buy right now. The former has a tag of 9 499, while the latter is Apple’s iPhone SE Lineup replaced 9 599. Both phones offer a clean design, which is practically better than the flush camera module, front fat bells, and battery life, in some cases, better than their expensive counterparts. However, they are different in a large aspect – camera.

Nos: I turned to 9a for three weeks from my Pixel 9 Pro – now I suggest buying

Apple’s latest admission level iPhone costs $ 100 and plays the same rear camera. When it is upgraded to a new 48MP sensor compared to the iPhone SE and only 2025 mainstream phones to play a back camera. On the contrary, Google maintains dual rear camera setup from its predecessor. It connects a new 48MP main camera with a 13MP ultra -wild angle sensor.

I used both phones to pull photos in various scenarios and determine what is the better camera on the budget phone, and here are the results.

Note: All photos were taken in default points and shoot mode. Although it is possible to get better results with both cameras by adjusting the focus and exhibitions or editing the photo in the post, I have not made manual adjustments in more than 250 images I have received.

Pixel 9A vs iPhone 16 E: Camera Showdown

During the day, Pixel 9A and the iPhone 16 E can shoot both excellent visible images, but each of them signs in terms of science. The iPhone 16 e is on the hot side, which you do not feel unless you compare it with another phone production.

On the contrary, Google chooses more quiet, cool look, with blue color. He said, Pixel 9A got less details in the shadow compared to the iPhone. In the above shot, I prefer the iPhone for its warm look, though Google’s reflection is more accurate for real life. Overall, both phones have their own color tones, and this difference is only remarkable when you look at the pixel in buildings, walls and other excellent textures.

These two shots of pink flowers were caught at sunset. It seems that the iPhone struggles with highlights (see the white color in the petals), while the pixel 9 main maintains the pink color and gives the pink color from real life more comfortable. Apple’s shots look more saturated than.

The portraits shot on Google and Apple phones are different not only in processing and colors but also in the frame. Like your predecessor, Pixel 9A shoots portraits in a hard 1.5x frame or 2X and 3X, which has no option to capture portraits in 1X. In comparison, the iPhone 16 E allows you to shoot at 1x, 2x and 3X.

Nos: i turned my iPhone 16 Pro with 16e for two weeks – here’s my purchase advice refreshing

Pixel 9A occupies better portraits. It provides better skin tone, color accuracy, and more natural visible fade. Meanwhile, the iPhone 16 E offers a warm look and wrong fade. The way he blurred my office chair looks like I was a superpose on the picture. Perhaps this is why it is important to have a secondary camera for arrest. Overall, I preferred the Pixel portrait over the iPhone.

Night mode is not the best of both, and both provide noise -filled images. This can be expected to be fair, with devices in the Midrej category. But when you compare both phones, there is a clear winner. Google’s Pixel 9A offers more details and real color to life. See skin head and hair on my friend’s arms – the iPhone couldn’t find the details correct. Apple’s shot is bright, which can appeal to more and more people, but I will pixel 9A for color accuracy.

Google continues its lead with better skin and color accuracy on the front camera. On the other hand, if you look closely at my forehead, the iPhone’s selfie is getting a bit smooth. Both can blow the light, as can be seen on my forehead, but Google maintains more details.

Nos: This 360 degree camera is even more easy to shoot videos than your phone

Both phones are struggling with clarification and sophistication on my beard. That said, Pixel 9A’s selfie shooter for group shots is better because it offers more and more people a wider 120 degree field to go to the frame.

The purpose of these shots is to show the perseverance of the Pixel 9A camera. Ultra Wild Angle Camera allows you to find more approaches by widening your frame up to 0.5x, while the iPhone is limited to 1X. I caught them against the light, which is difficult to be correct, but Google exposed the shot better than the 16E primary camera.

Nos: Google Pixel 8A vs Pixel 9A: We tested both Midrejphone, and the winner is not so obvious

Both phones allow you to capture macro shots. Pixel 9A gets closer to this topic and provides a lot of details on macro articles than the iPhone 16E.

Decision

Google Pixel 9A Cost is $ 100 less and provides a better set of camera than Apple IPhone 16 e. The latter is not bad, but it loses the mark in various scenarios and is not as versatile as its counterpart. It can still shoot some very good -looking images in bright conditions, but the difference is wider in light. If reliability and ability are the same as you are, then Pixel 9A wins in connection with both.

Overall, Google Pixel offers better portraits, macro shots, and low light imaging capabilities than the 9A $ 599 iPhone 16 E. But, of course, the winner eventually depends on how color, details, and articles are presented.