EveryOneHub
The International Space Station acts as a cyclical scientific laboratory where astronaut tests. The Trump administration has proposed to reduce its budget by about $ 500 million and reduce research at the checkpoint. AP/Roskomos Space Agency Press Service Hide captions
When Casey Darey saw President Trump’s proposed budget for NASA, he could not believe those numbers.
“This is NASA’s worst budget I have seen in my life,” says Dreer, chief of the planet Society’s space policy, a non -profit that supports space search.
The budget suggests Deep deduction For NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, which oversees everything that looks for planets like Mars, from telescopes to deep trips to a robotic investigation. Dareyer says many of these projects cost billions of dollars to build and launch, but the budget deduction is so deep that it will need to close NASA active spacecraft that US taxpayers pay for them for which good science is preparing for dollars. “
This is not just a spacecraft – Trump’s proposed budget for the federal government will close a huge part of the US Scientific Enterprise. The National Science Foundation (NSF) will be reduced by half. The National Health Institute will lose $ 17 billion in financial support. Other agencies, such as the Department of Energy, the US Geological Survey and the National Ocean and the Environment Administration, will all see a total decline of billions of dollars.
Swodep, CEO of the American Association for Advancement of Science, says the proposals “would be disastrous if they were implemented.” If the Republican -controlled Congress follows Trump’s budget outline, Prakha has warned that it will slash science in every university and laboratory in the United States.
He says, “This is not just in places where I know the administration sometimes likes to come together, but throughout the country, it hollows out science across the country.”
Aurora shines near the South Environmental Research Observatory in Auroras Antarctica. The lab is operated by the National Ocean and Wammandi administration staff, along with the National Science Foundation. Both agencies are facing deep deductions for research. Patrick Chles/AP/NOA Hide captions
Long -term losses
So far, Most focus on Trump’s economic policy has been focused on prices. The president has said that he can increase the prices of some commodities, which causes short -term pain.
But some economists have warned that their disappointing budget for research unveiled last week as part of a major project, which also has long -term risks.
According to the Andrew Field House, a economist at Texas A&M University, this is because basic science indicates the economic growth of the United States. The effect of r & d’s on the economy.
He says, “In terms of dollars, economic profit is really, really high.” Since World War II, “Government R&D investment has been operating by about 20 to 25 percent of the US private sector’s production capacity.”
Consider the NSF Grant 8107494. In 1981, a scientist called John Jay Hopfield was given in 1981 for theoretical study of biological molecules and processes. The price of the grant was less than $ 300,000 at the time (ball below $ 1 million), and it financed work on an unclear theme of the Hopfield: artificial nerve network. This science has now achieved a multi -billion dollar revolution that strengthens the tech economy. He also won the Nobel Prize for the Hop Field in Physics last year.
Some economists believe that the private sector could do the same. Richard Sturn, who directed the Economic Policy at the Conservative Heritage Foundation, believes that the industry should finance most of the basic research in the United States.
He says, “I think getting a federal money from it – making these labs for their own food and getting money from private companies who want to do practically for people – I think so far is a better way to encourage growth.”
However, Even Stars says this deduction will not be a priority for them in scientific research.
He says, “If I was paying government expenses to save my life, it would not be the top in the list.”
And many other economists say that the industry can never replace the government as a fundraiser of basic research.
“Often, the private sector helps them in these basic research fields,” says American University economist Vasodio Ramsami.
He says the knowledge created is very common, and economic payment is far away.
That’s just the president’s proposed deductions – suggestions. This is the Congress that actually decides the budget. But if the lawmakers choose to comply with Trump’s budget outline, Ramswamy has said that the future of America’s overall domestic products may be higher. 4 % small As a result of these deductions. It is the size of the contraction during the major recession, which continued from December 2007 to June 2009 and was the country’s longest recession after World War II.
After all, they say, these deductions can cost the government a lot of money.
“Tomorrow the economy is about to decrease because you have decided to reduce this fund today,” he says. “And if your economy is small tomorrow, you are about to increase taxes.”
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings